Source
Religious freedom is good for peace, but today and attacks by ' two extremes both negative, "the" secularism "and" fundamentalism ".
Not bad as a statement on the eve of (...) in Egypt!
, said the Pope recited nell'Angelus after the "formal" making New Year's Eve.
implied the universal value of lay people in the constitutions of many democratic nations of the West, is equated with terrorism, Islamic fundamentalism!
A declaration passed by the serious media quotes implying an informed public, able to grasp the subtlety
(...) A statement irresponsible deliquenziale, mystifying reality, anti-historical, it tends to give a totally false image of secularism, everything is unacceptable, especially when the figure comes from a "charismatic" as sensitive to religious freedom (a words) because then in fact a replica of an attitude Nazi!
Secularism is the only universal value which guarantees every individual, the citizen beyond the sex or gender, culture or tradition of the exercise and the freedom to profess their faith in what the state is the guarantor of freedom of single.
means insignificant detail the costs of religious education are no longer dependent (...) state of public finances.
Without the appropriate exceptions ... Italy!
Below, not for readers but for "Nazzingher" that if the philosopher gives a brief review of the product that has ever repent ....
SECULARITY ': WHAT'
I. Definition. The term secularism means the separation occurred historically in the West especially with the rise and the rise of the modern state, including the religious sphere and the political sphere ("free church in a free state," according to the effective expression of Count Camillo Benso Cavour). A process that is based on a distinction also
typically modern: that between the inner hole or the private sphere and the political arena or public sphere. Religion, as in every kind of good vision and ultimate goals, must be
, according to the laity, a moral choice and the individual: it can inform the conduct of individuals, but can not have any particular claim on the behavior of others or on the laws of the State. Which, in contrast, must be strictly neutral
: that is, must remain on land as much as possible the formal conception or benefit of any religious denomination as much freedom of expression and a fundamental equality with the others.
, said the Pope recited nell'Angelus after the "formal" making New Year's Eve.
implied the universal value of lay people in the constitutions of many democratic nations of the West, is equated with terrorism, Islamic fundamentalism!
A declaration passed by the serious media quotes implying an informed public, able to grasp the subtlety
(...) A statement irresponsible deliquenziale, mystifying reality, anti-historical, it tends to give a totally false image of secularism, everything is unacceptable, especially when the figure comes from a "charismatic" as sensitive to religious freedom (a words) because then in fact a replica of an attitude Nazi!
Secularism is the only universal value which guarantees every individual, the citizen beyond the sex or gender, culture or tradition of the exercise and the freedom to profess their faith in what the state is the guarantor of freedom of single.
means insignificant detail the costs of religious education are no longer dependent (...) state of public finances.
Without the appropriate exceptions ... Italy!
Below, not for readers but for "Nazzingher" that if the philosopher gives a brief review of the product that has ever repent ....
SECULARITY ': WHAT'
I. Definition. The term secularism means the separation occurred historically in the West especially with the rise and the rise of the modern state, including the religious sphere and the political sphere ("free church in a free state," according to the effective expression of Count Camillo Benso Cavour). A process that is based on a distinction also
typically modern: that between the inner hole or the private sphere and the political arena or public sphere. Religion, as in every kind of good vision and ultimate goals, must be
, according to the laity, a moral choice and the individual: it can inform the conduct of individuals, but can not have any particular claim on the behavior of others or on the laws of the State. Which, in contrast, must be strictly neutral
: that is, must remain on land as much as possible the formal conception or benefit of any religious denomination as much freedom of expression and a fundamental equality with the others.
II. Work on the history of the term .
The term secularism or secularism is now used only in French and Italian. Of Greek origin, referring to the people then warrior in his relationship with his head variously present in the Christian-medieval, when indicated believers who had not taken the priestly orders, and the lemma reappears in the eighteenth century in England for a short period of time to indicate the usurpation of the rights to the priesthood. Today, English is mostly used saecularism term, however, meaning that less pregnant and indicates the more general process of disenchantment (in the Weberian sense) occurring in our world.
III. Secularism and its opposite: the clericalism.
III. Secularism and its opposite: the clericalism.
The opposite of secularism and the confessional, or rather the clerical claim to inform the laws of the state to come by religious precepts, imposing on anyone (maybe with good intention to benefit him) certain behaviors, read on .... 
0 comments:
Post a Comment